Shares-for-shares M&A transaction: Sellers to take note

Linkedin Post

An M&A transaction in which the consideration for the shares in the target company is settled by shares in the acquiring company (purchaser) requires more planning than a cash transaction.

A seller should consider the following to assess whether receiving shares in the purchaser in exchange for the sale of the target company is feasible:

1. Due diligence on the purchaser

When a seller acquires shares in the purchaser in consideration for the sale of the target company, it is prudent to conduct due diligence on the purchaser.

The due diligence on the purchaser in this context may range from limited due diligence to detailed due diligence with focus on specific areas.

The seller needs to satisfy itself that the shares in the purchaser are worth the sale price of the target company. The seller should also consider the time and cost of conducting due diligence on the purchaser.

2. More extensive representations and warranties from purchaser

The representations and warranties provided by a purchaser in an M&A transaction where the consideration is paid by cash are typically limited to fundamental representations and warranties such as legal existence, due incorporation and good standing.

However, when a seller acquires shares in the purchaser in consideration for the sale of the target company, the seller would want more extensive representations and warranties from the purchaser. This may lengthen the negotiation process.

3. Challenges of claim against purchaser

In view that the seller will hold shares in the purchaser, it may not be feasible for the seller to seek indemnity from the purchaser or bring an action against the purchaser if there is a breach of the purchaser’s representations or warranties or default by the purchaser.

This post first appeared on LinkedIn on 31 August 2023.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …