The veto power of minority shareholders

Company Law

Minority shareholders are powerful.

Shareholders who either singularly or collectively hold at least 25% of the voting shares in a company may veto on the following matters in relation to the company as provided under the Companies Act 2016 of Malaysia:

• Change of name (s. 28)

• Adoption of constitution (s. 32)

• Amendment of constitution (s. 36)

• Conversion from an unlimited company to a limited company (s.40)

• Conversion from public companies to private companies or private companies to public companies (s. 41)

• Alteration of share capital (unless provided otherwise in the constitution) including by way of consolidation and division of share capital, conversion of paid-up shares into stock, reconversion of stock into paid-up shares and subdivision of shares (s. 84)

• Variation of rights attached to shares in a class of shares (s. 91)

• Reduction of share capital (ss. 115 -117)

• Financial assistance by a company whose shares are not quoted on a stock exchange for the acquisition of a share in the company or its holding company or for reducing or discharging a liability incurred for such an acquisition (s. 126)

• Payment of interest on share capital issued to raise money to defray construction expenses (s. 130)

• Members’ right for management review (s. 195)

• Payments to director way of compensation for loss of office or as consideration in connection with his retirement from office (s. 227)

• Voluntary winding up (s. 439)

• Removal of liquidator in members’ voluntary winding up (s. 445)

• Arrangement entered into between a company about to be or in the course of being wound up and its creditors (s. 460)

• Winding up by Court (s. 465)

In M&A transactions, being aware of shareholders’ rights as provided under the Companies Act helps in negotiating shareholders’ agreement where there is more than one shareholder post completion.

malaysiancorporatelawyer
mergersandacquisitions
companiesact

This post first appeared on LinkedIn on 25 May 2023.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …