What Often Slows Down M&A Deals for Founders and Family Businesses

Linkedin Post

After more than a decade advising buyers in M&A transactions, I’ve seen that delays in legal due diligence are often caused by minor issues that take time to resolve.

The following are three common issues that frequently slow down legal due diligence on target companies:

1. Incomplete banking documents

Management teams sometimes only realise their banking facility documentation is incomplete when due diligence begins. They then have to request the missing documents from the banks, which can take time.

In worst-case scenarios, even the banks are unable to locate the security documents referenced in the letter of offer, either because they were never executed or have gone missing altogether.

2. Incomplete or inconsistent corporate records

This is a common and time-consuming problem.

Time is needed to identify the missing documents or inconsistencies, confirm the correct position with the management or company secretary, and then rectify and reproduce the records.

Each step adds to the timeline.

In one transaction, we encountered multiple documents stating different dates for the circulation of financial statements to shareholders. Additional time was required to identify, reconcile, and flag the discrepancies.

3. Licences provided without conditions

Target companies sometimes provide copies of licences but omit the conditions attached to them.

This results in further information requests and additional time spent following up.

Founders and sellers,

If you want to keep your transaction moving, addressing these issues before legal due diligence begins can make a meaningful difference to deal timelines.

I share insights like this to help clients and counsels navigate Malaysian M&A with clarity. If you’re preparing for a sale or acquisition, always happy to connect.

#MalaysianCorporateLawyer

This post was first posted on LinkedIn on 18 December 2025.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …