When do you need a shareholders’ agreement?

Mergers and acquisitions
Linkedin Post

It should be before there’s conflict, not after.

The ideal time is:
• when the business is starting out; or
• when there is a new shareholder.

Without it, even strong relationships can break down when there are changes.

I’ve seen it happen when one corporate shareholder changes management. The other shareholder gets sidelined. There is no clear way out as there is not shareholders’ agreement.

A well-drafted shareholders’ agreement covers:
• exit options if the relationship breaks down
• minority protections on key decisions
• clarity on how the business should be run.

Many founders and shareholders ask for fee quotes on shareholders’ agreements, but few follow through, treating them as a “nice to have.”

Conversations about shareholder issues may not always be easy, but it’s far better to reach an agreement while the relationship is amicable than to negotiate amid conflict.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

This post was first posted on LinkedIn on 9 June 2025.

Due Diligence
Where Company Secretaries Make the Biggest Impact in M&A

At the heart of every legal due diligence for M&A transactions is verification of share ownership. One of the documents requested to verify share ownership is the register of members. It seems like a simple request, yet during some due diligence exercises, I have been provided with the following except …

Due Diligence
M&A Tip: Why Sellers Should Provide Share Ownership Documents (Not Just the CCM Search)

One of the biggest sources of delay in Malaysian M&A due diligence is surprisingly simple: Sellers often provide a company search from the Companies Commission of Malaysia (CCM) when what lawyers really need are the statutory share documents. A lawyer conducting proper due diligence will typically request documents such as:  Shareholders’ …

Lawyering
The Art of Track Change

One of the first things newly qualified lawyers learn (if they haven’t already) is how to use track changes in Word. It’s a simple but powerful tool. It lets the partner, the person reviewing their work, or the counterparty’s counsel quickly see what’s been amended. (In theory) it saves time, …